We need to talk about false flags and black propaganda
With the Balenciaga scandal I think it’s time to revisit a ‘debunked’ hoax Pizzagate. Some critics of Balenciaga are already talking about Pizzagate again. Will another guilt by association attack be used to silence critics of Balenciaga?
Who determines what’s fake news or disinformation? Those who hold the power of course. But conspiracy theories, what’s wrong with those? Conspiracies exist, theorizing about possible conspiracies is necessary. What people mean with the term is false conspiracy theories. Paranoid delusions. But how are conspiracy theories debunked? When do they count as debunked? If accusation are disproven in a truly independent court of law? No, apparently some details or added claims seeming nonsensical is sufficient. Which brings us too… Pizzagate. There is an elaborate narrative pushed by Far Right Clinton opponents. I don’t care for either narrative or how it may have been refuted exactly. I just care about the Podesta emails that started the whole thing.
The Podesta emails clearly did contain coded language.
“The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yours? [sic] They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.”
“It’s mine, but not worth worrying about.”
It’s not a paranoid conspiracy to question whether there really is a handkerchief with a pizza-related map. Or this:
“We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure.”
This speaks for itself. Why didn’t this get the attention it deserves? Does it matter whether pizza was specifically a code word or whether a pizzaplace was used as a place of abuse? That doesn’t distract from this.
After Epstein, his mysterious death and then the mysterious murder of his associate Jean-Luc Brunel in France, this needs to be examined. Both men died before they could talk in two separate countries on two different continents.
Bill Clinton was likely involved. One of his key people John Podesta was not only linked to those weird emails but his brother Tony owned some of the disturbing ‘art’ of Serbian ‘artist’ Biljana Đurđević which shows half-naked children in seductive and submissive poses and situations related to bondage. Tony claimed John had nothing to do with it but they don’t appear to be on overly bad terms exactly. They jointly run the Podesta Group. Đurđević’s work is obscene and should be banned. He deserves no support, only condemnation.
Why is there this generalizing debunking of conspiracy theories regarding child abuse, when there is circumstantial evidence? Why do witnesses keep dying when there is no crime?